Eugenics in the Gym

Eugenics played a surprisingly big, often indirect role in shaping early physical education (PE) programs in U.S. public schools. In the late 19th and early 20th centuries, eugenicists were deeply invested in improving the population’s health and hygiene as well as its reproductive “quality.” PE fit that vision. If strong bodies could be trained and maintained, the thinking went, so could strong bloodlines.

To eugenic enthusiasts, a strong, well-formed body was a visible sign of good heredity. Those who were “unfit” were often considered weak, sickly, or malformed. Promoting exercise, then, wasn’t just about public health; it was also about cultivating and showcasing the nation’s “best stock.”

School PE programs were often viewed as tools for improving the racial vitality of “select” youth and fighting off the supposed degeneration of modern life. Physical training promised to restore moral fiber, toughen future soldiers, and revive a sense of national vigor. By World War I, the link between physical fitness and the language of eugenics was nearly seamless. A weak body was more than a personal failing; it was seen as a threat to the nation itself.

Not every gym class was explicitly eugenic, of course, but eugenic ideals — heredity, improvement, national strength — were part of many educational reforms. PE was a way of spreading eugenic ideals under the banner of health, discipline, and progress.

For more on the topic:

See Lynn E. Couturier, “The Influence of the Eugenics Movement on Physical Education in the United States,” Sport History Review 36, no. 1 (2005): 21-42, at https://doi.org/10.1123/shr.36.1.21.

You might also like:

In a similar vein, the “Muscular Christianity” (also called “Masculine Christianity”) movement took things a step further to tie ideas about physical fitness and the aesthetics of athleticism to religious masculinity and duty.